https://harbingersdaily.com/obergefells-days-are-numbered-we-must-pray-fight-and-contend-until-it-is-overturned/
" The Lord is near to all who call on him, to all who call on him in truth. " — Psalm 145:18
AI GENERATED CRITIQUE
Here's a summary and critique of the article you provided from Harbinger's Daily titled "Obergefell v. Hodges's Days Are Numbered; We Must Pray, Fight, and Contend Until It Is Overturned". I am about 90% confident in this assessment based on the available information.
✅ Summary
The article argues the following points:
It reports that the Kim Davis case — specifically Davis v. Ermold — reflects a broader fight for "religious liberty" and opposition to same-sex marriage. It says the Obergefell v. Hodges decision "fabricated a 'right' to same-sex 'marriage' nationwide."
The article claims that denying Davis's petition is a "miscarriage of justice" and a "stark departure from the Constitution" as the author(s) interpret it.
The piece asserts that Obergefell has "no basis in the Constitution" and that its days are "numbered," asserting that it will be overturned.
It urges the reader to "pray, fight, and contend" until the decision is overturned.
The article is authored by Mat Staver, who is described as founder and president of Liberty Counsel and a contributor to Family Research Council.
🔍 Critique
Here are some points to consider—both strengths and questions/weaknesses—in the article's argumentation, especially given your interests in Christian faith and blogging.
Strengths
The article is clear and consistent in presenting its viewpoint: it frames this as a faith-based call to action, which aligns with its audience.
It situates the legal argument (Davis case) as a lived example of what the author sees as consequences of Obergefell.
It invokes religious conscience and the idea of "religious liberty" in public service roles, which is an issue of genuine debate and importance.
🎯
📝 My View
In my judgment:
The article is valid as a faith-based opinion piece.
