Voice of the Voiceless

Thursday, February 18, 2016

Re "SODOMITICAL" v non-SODOMITICAL SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: "Conservative Media Refuse to Cover New Book on Gay Movement "- Breitbart

Re "SODOMITICAL" v non-SODOMITICAL SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: "Conservative Media Refuse to Cover New Book on Gay Movement "- Breitbart

AHA! THAT'S A TERM I'VE BEEN SEARCHING FOR...WITH THE REALIZATION THAT SOME so-CALLED SAME-SEX MARRIAGES MAY NOT PRACTICE "SODOMY" OR OTHER FORMS OF PERVERSE SEX. MAYBE SOME SOME so-CALLED SAME-SEX MARRIAGES ARE JUST CLOSE FRIENDSHIP without SEXUALITY,and then could be called "NON-SODOMITIC". That would change the equation a little bit. I haven't read the book so I'm jumping at conclusions,or making my own,but I would more willing to accept non-sodomitic same-sex relationships than sodomitic. Apparently,however, the establishment isn't willing to talk about this,or even make the differentiation. Not even the conservatives? Why not?!
*****
"Reilly moves into very tough and dangerous territory,
and this may be at least one of the parts of the book
making conservative editors edgy. He suggests that
inveterate sinning can lead to a deadening of the
conscience and, in order to maintain inveterate
sinning, an elaborate edifice of justification must be
erected. The edifice of justification is built not just by
the sinner but a willing society around him. Reilly
minces no words. The sin he has in mind is sodomy.
Even that word is deeply offensive to LGBTs. He refers
not to same-sex marriage but to "sodomitical
marriage." He shows how sodomy was punished
sometimes by death throughout history including in
the early United States.
..."
http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2014/06/08/conservative-media-refuse-to-cover-new-book-on-gay-movement/